Quant Macro Investing

Risk Taking Disciplined

Ultimate Guide To Becoming A Quant By Mark Joshi

Ultimate Guide To Becoming A Quant By Mark Joshi

December 10, 2009

Very interesting overview of the quant world, if nothing else it will give you an overview of quant jobs and the lunacy or (brilliance depending your view) of wall st.

Click Here To Read:  Ultimate Guide To Becoming A Quant

What sorts of quant are there?

(1) Front office/desk quant
(2) Model validating quant
(3) Research quant
(4) Quant developer
(5) Statistical arbitrage quant
(6) Capital quant

A desk quant implements pricing models directly used by traders.Main plusses close to the money and opportunities to move into trading. Minuses can be stressful and depending on the outfit may not involve much research.

A model validation quant independently implements pricing models in order to check that front office models are correct. Plusses more relaxed, less stressful. Minusses model validation teams can be uninspired and far from the money.

A Research quant tries to invent new pricing approaches and sometimes carries out blue-sky research. Plusses it’s interesting and you learn a lot more. Minusses sometimes hard to justify your existence.

A Quant developer, a glorifed programmer but well-paid and easier to find a job. This sort of job can vary a lot. It could be coding scripts quickly all the time, or working on a large system debugging someone else’s code.

A Statistical arbitrage quant, works on finding patterns in data to suggest automated trades. The techniques are quite different from those in derivatives pricing. This sort of job is most commonly found in hedge funds. The return on this type of position is highly volatile!

A capital quant works on modelling the bank’s credit exposures and capital requirements. This is less sexy than derivatives pricing but is becoming more and more important with the advent of the Basel II banking accord. You can expect decent (but not great) pay, less stress and more sensible hours. There is currently a drive to mathematically model the chance of operational losses through fraud etc, with mixed degrees of success.

People do banking for the money, and you tend to get paid more the closer you are to where the money is being made. This translates into a sort of snobbery where those close to the money look down on those who aren’t. As a general rule, moving away from the money is easy, moving towards it is hard.

December 11, 2009 - Posted by | Uncategorized

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: